|
Dark Matter | |
Champion
Awards:
 
Group: Member
Posts: 4563
| I completely disagree with your starter choices Lody (apart from maybe Charmander). Sorry. Bulbasaur > Squirtle. Totidile > Cyndaquil. Torchic < Treeko < Mudkip.
------------
Want to know when a pokemon evolves or what moves it learns? Having trouble uncovering hidden items? Visit the Official Pokemon Twilight Guide!
Got any questions about PT or the forums? Visit the FAQ!
Official Beta Tester for Pokemon Twilight
Highest poster on the GFF
Most active member on the GFF
66 (+2 special) out of 66 Pokemon Obtained on PTV5! Every single one of 'em!
 |
|
|
|
dum0dum | |
Champion
Awards:
Group: Member
Posts: 3618
| QUOTE: Lody screw you!
I pick fire!
Thank you for completely misreading that comment!
QUOTE: Lody
grass is actually the best in B/W which is odd for a pokemon game.
Odd for a pokemon game? your mileage may very on that some people actually think it would be odd not to have an epic grass starter.
QUOTE: Lody like bulbasuar is cool, but squirtle is cooler (he wears sunnys after all) and charmander is the best.
Again YMMV. just because you prefer fire doesn't make it the best choice it makes it the hardest choice with gym placement and such but still I prefer bulbasaur over both charmander and squirtle.
QUOTE: Lody chikorita is wow, but totodile is WOWer (it's a crocodile after all) and cyndaquil rules cos it's deceitful.
Though I do agree that cyndaquil is badass but I would place chikorita over totodile.
QUOTE: Lody treecko is awesome, but mudkipz is awesomer (it's mudkip! need I say more?) and torchic obviously is the best.
And here is where it gets ridiculous though getting a blaziken would justify picking torchic it is not the best starter if I had to pick an unevolvable 3rd gen starter I would be conflicted between mudkip or treeko but not torchic torchic itself looks terrible to me.
QUOTE: Lody but gen 4 and 5 is where the water starter is s***, and gen 5 specifically is where the fire starter is even s***tier than the water starter.
Piplup was actually a good starter and as for the 5th gen water starter it was obvious they were trying to pick up another piplup but at leas they were able to make it badass in its final evos. I think the only truly terrible starters were the fire ones with the overused monkey design, the terrible bipedal pig and whatnot. the grass ones are always very good.
------------
A pox on all of you! |
|
|
|
radiant17 | |
Guild Member
Awards:
Group: Member
Posts: 978
| I agree that Chimchar's a waste of space in the Pokemon games. But I still think the pig isn't that bad. That's just my opinion, though. Personally, I like the grass starter in the 5th gen. the best. But again, that's just my opinion.
------------
Ask me about my current game project, Creatures! |
|
|
 Lody | |
League Master
Awards:
 
Group: Member
Posts: 2135
Donor: $250.00
| @dum0dum: I was replying to dm, not you.
@DM: sceptile<swampert<blaziken, so there! though I still like torchic anyways, combusken is kinda gay though.
------------
|
|
|
|
Dark Matter | |
Group: Member
| I dislike the Blaziken design (as well as Combusken). |
|
|
|
Lody | |
Group: Member
Donor: $250.00
| I dunno, it's pretty cool when you consider that it's also a fighting type. |
|
|
|
Dark Matter | |
Group: Member
| The types might be good, i just don't think it looks that good. Too humanoid/chicken. Needs some originality in there. |
|
|
|
dum0dum | |
Group: Member
| it looks nothing like a chicken when it hits blaziken and what about originality? have you noticed that all pokemon are based off real species of animals how can it be original? and then again theres the fact that there are hundreds of animal species that look amazingly similar and yet the slightest difference labels them as a completely new family. |
|
|
|
GoldenGoshawk | |
Pyco Artist
Awards:
Group: Member
Posts: 697
| I agree that Blaziken doesn't look like a chicken (apart from its claws), but I like the design
------------
|
|
|
|
KFA | |
Student
Awards:
 
Group: Member
Posts: 16
| Gallade, obviously, should not exist. Because we all love sexy male gardevoirs from GenIII, don't we?
Edit: Okay, I think that any pokémon that can be eaten should not exist. Like Cherubi. Then there's pokémon who strongly resemble humans, from genV Nageki and Dageki. |
|
|
|
Dark Matter | |
Group: Member
| Yeah. Any pokemon that resemble humans (Mr. Mime, quite a few of the gen. 5 ones) should be destroyed. |
|
|
|
radiant17 | |
Group: Member
| QUOTE: KFA Gallade, obviously, should not exist. Because we all love sexy male gardevoirs from GenIII, don't we?
Edit: Okay, I think that any pokémon that can be eaten should not exist. Like Cherubi. Then there's pokémon who strongly resemble humans, from genV Nageki and Dageki.
Most of the Pokemon can be eaten. Squirtle stew, steamed Shellder, leg of Mareep... I wouldn't eat a Grimer, though. |
|
|
|
HyperSerpent2638 | |
Trainer
Awards:
 
Group: Member
Posts: 132
| Magikarp...... Until it evolves.
------------
Lol yayz for spending 14 hours working on a video game. Hi NIAJABOY and DM O.O :) U rock Bouncy Ball! Xterm and Corona pm me if your on |
|
|
|
KFA | |
Group: Member
| QUOTE: radiant17 QUOTE: KFA Gallade, obviously, should not exist. Because we all love sexy male gardevoirs from GenIII, don't we?
Edit: Okay, I think that any pokémon that can be eaten should not exist. Like Cherubi. Then there's pokémon who strongly resemble humans, from genV Nageki and Dageki.
Most of the Pokemon can be eaten. Squirtle stew, steamed Shellder, leg of Mareep... I wouldn't eat a Grimer, though. |
|
|
|
GoldenGoshawk | |
Group: Member
| you mean every pokemon that looks like food, such as a cherry |
|
|
|
Dark Matter | |
Group: Member
| QUOTE: KFA QUOTE: radiant17 QUOTE: KFA Gallade, obviously, should not exist. Because we all love sexy male gardevoirs from GenIII, don't we?
Edit: Okay, I think that any pokémon that can be eaten should not exist. Like Cherubi. Then there's pokémon who strongly resemble humans, from genV Nageki and Dageki.
Most of the Pokemon can be eaten. Squirtle stew, steamed Shellder, leg of Mareep... I wouldn't eat a Grimer, though.
Everything can be eaten and that's a fact. You missed my point. |
|
|
|
radiant17 | |
Group: Member
| So what was the point that I missed? That none of them except Rock, most poison and ghost types shouldn't exist? |
|
|
|
Dark Matter | |
Group: Member
| Ah, who knows? |
|
|
|
KFA | |
Group: Member
| And who cares.
QUOTE: you mean every pokemon that looks like food, such as a cherry
You can put it that way.
(everything is edible, just that your system doesn't necessarily consume it. I ate some little rocks when I was a little dips*** :))
Fu.. I meant the pokémon that seems to be based on food. You can argue all you want but I still can't really explain what I mean. Just... look at them. |
|
|
|
dum0dum | |
Group: Member
| Well Cats are edible too so are most animals but we don't eat them because they're domesticated/traditionally not eaten by a certain cultures I assume most pokemon are in fact edible but that would be the equivalent to eating your pet dog for some for other would be eating a poison frog and for other like eating a cow. |
|
|
What pokemon shouldn't exist
